We are excited to announce the launch of our new forums! You can access it forums.aavso.org. For questions, please see our blog post. The forums at aavso.org/forum have become read-only.
Announcement: New Applications
The existing WebObs will soon be replaced by WebObs 2.0! Please use this application to submit future observations: Submit Photometric Observations
ka5sma
Affiliation
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
Fri, 10/27/2023 - 22:11
Does anyone know if there is such a thing as a conversion constant or figure
for converting Clear Channel CCD images to V Mag?
MZK
Affiliation
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
If you are using a Clear filter for photometry because a target is very faint or you don't have a V filter (get one!), you can report your magnitudes as CV. You should measure your target magnitude by comparison to the V magnitudes of your comps per your normal process. Do not report the magnitude as V BUT CV. It is an acceptable/appropriate filter name in an AAVSO Report.
HTH, Ken
or to post comments
ka5sma
Affiliation
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
If you are indeed using a monochrome CCD without a filter, then CV is the choice. If the object's magnitude is changing, you will get a light curve when you plot it vs time.
Ray TRE
or to post comments
rth
Affiliation
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
If you are not using a filter, shouldn't it be reported as unfiltered? The CV filter choice is for data taken through the green channel of a DSLR (or other color camera)-- I don't think unfiltered data would fit there.
WebObs gives you a choice of "unfiltered with V zero point" which would be for unfiltered data using v magnitudes for your reference stars (as I understand it).
Tom
or to post comments
MZK
Affiliation
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
A magnitude from the green channel of the Bayer array in a DSLR/OSC camera should be reported as TG (tri-color green) not CV. The green channel filter is certainly not a 'clear' filter. This TG magnitude is calculated by comparison to the catalog V magnitude of your comparison stars.
Ken
or to post comments
weo
Affiliation
American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)
In the AAVSO International Database, 'CV' means that an observation was made without a filter and reduced to a V zeropoint using Johnson V-magnitude comparison stars (not v magnitude comp stars). The C stands for 'clear' - that is, no filter - and the V stands for the V zeropoint.
Similarly, if an observation were made without a filter and reduced to a Cousins R zeropoint using Cousins R-magnitiude comparison stars, it would be tagged as 'CR'.
This is how these types of observations are generally referred to in current astronomical publications.
Michael:
If you are using a Clear filter for photometry because a target is very faint or you don't have a V filter (get one!), you can report your magnitudes as CV. You should measure your target magnitude by comparison to the V magnitudes of your comps per your normal process. Do not report the magnitude as V BUT CV. It is an acceptable/appropriate filter name in an AAVSO Report.
HTH, Ken
thanks but this is for producting a light-curve..Photometry data....not pretty pictures....
If you are indeed using a monochrome CCD without a filter, then CV is the choice. If the object's magnitude is changing, you will get a light curve when you plot it vs time.
Ray TRE
If you are not using a filter, shouldn't it be reported as unfiltered? The CV filter choice is for data taken through the green channel of a DSLR (or other color camera)-- I don't think unfiltered data would fit there.
WebObs gives you a choice of "unfiltered with V zero point" which would be for unfiltered data using v magnitudes for your reference stars (as I understand it).
Tom
Tom:
A magnitude from the green channel of the Bayer array in a DSLR/OSC camera should be reported as TG (tri-color green) not CV. The green channel filter is certainly not a 'clear' filter. This TG magnitude is calculated by comparison to the catalog V magnitude of your comparison stars.
Ken
In the AAVSO International Database, 'CV' means that an observation was made without a filter and reduced to a V zeropoint using Johnson V-magnitude comparison stars (not v magnitude comp stars). The C stands for 'clear' - that is, no filter - and the V stands for the V zeropoint.
Similarly, if an observation were made without a filter and reduced to a Cousins R zeropoint using Cousins R-magnitiude comparison stars, it would be tagged as 'CR'.
This is how these types of observations are generally referred to in current astronomical publications.
Good observing,
Elizabeth Waagen, AAVSO HQ